TWUUG Mailing List Archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [twuug] Space Shuttle Columbia blows up on reentry!
- From: mike <seafire@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 2 Feb 2003 22:08:03 -0500
- Subject: Re: [twuug] Space Shuttle Columbia blows up on reentry!
As many of you know, I work for NASA. Luckily, though, I don't speak for the
Agency. I thought I'd add my 2 pfennig to the discussion.
I'm old enough to remember before the Shuttle was built that it was sold to
the public and Congress on the notion that its "primary" purpose was to
provide inexpensive commercial access to space. It was also as a side mission
going to provide a place for NASA to conduct "science". As time went on, and
the number of shuttles that could be afforded declined, the commercial
applications started to give way to more "science". After the Challenger
disaster, the Shuttle's manifest was switched to make science the primary
user. So much has the pendulum swung that the "science" being conducted was
not "What things REQUIRE a man in space to do?" (e.g. certain types of
metallurgical processing can't be done on Earth because gravity affects the
distribution of molecules and crystalline structures) but rather "What things
can we do to fill the time available, er, no, uh, to satisfy our curiosity?"
Indeed, during the last few years at NASA the notion has been widely touted
that the Agency's space program (manned and exploration) is about satisfying
the public's curiosity.
One thing the Columbia's tragic end will hopefully re-ignite is a return to
the reason to go and work in space. Imagine a place where materials can be
produced a thousand times stronger than here on Earth. Imagine a place where
certain types of drugs can be manufactured that use complex crystalline
structures to attach, remove, and flush cancer cells from the body. Imagine a
system like the Shuttle that could deliver enough OSSs (Open Source
Satellites, TM) in one load to provide broadband Internet access to all Linux
users's groups in the country. Even though I have nothing to do with the
space side of the NASA house, this disaster will impact me in my job. Budgets
will no doubt be in flux for some time to come, just as they were after the
Challenger mishap. The budget I might have been hoping for to develop search
and rescue UAVs for police and firefighters here on Earth may get swallowed
up recovering from the Columbia accident. I'm a curious sort of guy so I know
the temptation to believe a lot of people in the general public share my
curiosity to try new things just to see what there is to see.
Yes, it is true that human's inherent curiosity has driven many discoveries.
However, I find that this particular pearl has been paid for with too high a
price. I hope the Creator of all things will guide the seven who perished, a
job made easier by their slipping "the surly bonds of Earth" and being
207,000 feet closer to "touch the face of God".
mike L.
-
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
* To unsubscribe from the TWUUG discussion list, either send e-mail to
- twuug-request@twuug.org with the word "unsubscribe" by itself
- in the body of the message or visit:
- http://www.twuug.org/lists/twuuglists.html
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index